|
|
Setting up a 4e game
Last post 07-10-2008, 9:56 AM by armydeone. 46 replies.
-
06-14-2008, 7:42 AM |
-
06-15-2008, 8:18 AM |
|
|
Hi,
I would be interested in playing. What kind of further information can you give about the 4e game or will it come available when it does?
-OnButterflyWings
-OnButterflyWings
|
|
-
06-15-2008, 9:40 AM |
-
Nova
-
-
-
Joined on 07-08-2004
-
Canada
-
Posts 7,681
-
-
|
Well, I was thinking of running either Keep on the Shadowfell or
the sample adventure from the DMG. If everyones read both of those
then I'll go through my old adventure archive and convert something.
Furthermore I was thinking of using the online adaption to put KotS
into Ebberon, but that was just an idea I've been kicking
around.
As of now I'm using one house rule which is we won't
be using the new alignment system, since I'm sick of alinemnt
debates and there are so few game effects I figure I can convert
them on the fly. Instead we will be using a form of the allegiances
system from d20 modern (heavily modified, included at the end of
this post)
Other then that I'm planing on using the 4e rules as written,
with 100gp/character and 22 points buy as detailed in the PHB. (As
3.X point buy but you start with 8/10/10/10/10/10)
I'll be using the 4e books, but anyone who only has KotS can use
those rules and we'll make any necessary adjustments as we go. I can
provide a pregen for anyone who doesn't have any rules, or help you
through rollup over IRC/MSN/Google talk.
Details of Canageeks Allegiances system:
I'll lay out
that system now: Everyone picks at least one guiding principle to
which they owe alligence. Example: Justice, Law, Good, the teachings
of Pelor, the Queen, Self, Money, Pleasure, Power. You can pick more
then one (and most people do). You cannot pick mutually elusive
allegiances (ie Good and Evil, the teachings of Bane and Pelor).
You then put your allegiances in order form most influence over
you to least influence. Example: If a character has 1: Justice, 2:
Law he will first do what is the just thing in his opinion, then the
lawful thing. Note this is not a hard and fast rule, but an RP
guideline.
Clerics & Paladins must have allegiances to the god they
worship, as well as anyone with a cleric or paladin paragon path.
Allegiance can be added/removed at any extended rest since they
represent your characters beliefs which can change over time.
-Nova
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY of intellectuals to speak the truth and to expose lies. --The Responsibility of Intellectuals, Noam Chomsky. The New York Review of Books, February 23, 1967.
|
|
-
06-16-2008, 8:55 PM |
-
06-17-2008, 8:34 AM |
-
06-18-2008, 7:00 PM |
-
06-18-2008, 9:07 PM |
-
06-18-2008, 9:17 PM |
-
06-19-2008, 8:04 AM |
-
Nova
-
-
-
Joined on 07-08-2004
-
Canada
-
Posts 7,681
-
-
|
Ok, I've made a quikstart rules pdf if anyone doesn't have the 4e books. Let me know if you want a copy, as well as how I should send it too you. The Pregen characters for Keep on the Shandowfell are avaiilbe from WoTC here. I'd recommend that anyone who doesn't have the rules pick one of those, however if you really hate using pregens I can help you roll up over IRC or some IM client. I'd like to confirm that we will be playing H1: Keep on the Shadowfell, anyone who's already played/read it let me know and I can use another adventure. Also whats everyones play style? Any heavy RPs here? or should I just get to the killing? I can adapt, just let me know what you expect. I'll default to a mix, though this is a combat heavy adventure. Edit: I don't really char about how you do your charcacter sheet so long as I can have a copy. If your using a pregen just tell me which one. You can either type out your character with DnDorks character function (they don't have 4e characters yet so you'd have to use text), mythweavers or a similar site or even just emailing me a pdf or scan (I recommend cutepdf or similar to make a copy to email me if your having trouble saving it). My email is Canageek |at| gmail |.| |com|.
-Nova IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY of intellectuals to speak the truth and to expose lies. --The Responsibility of Intellectuals, Noam Chomsky. The New York Review of Books, February 23, 1967.
|
|
-
06-19-2008, 8:37 AM |
-
06-19-2008, 9:07 AM |
-
06-19-2008, 11:17 AM |
-
06-19-2008, 12:17 PM |
-
06-19-2008, 1:49 PM |
-
06-19-2008, 2:47 PM |
Page 1 of 4 (47 items)
1
|
|
|